Growing up in the west doesn't make Islamics love the west- hence the home-grown jihadists.
15/01/2011

Across the western world, Islamic terrorists are increasingly "home grown," those who have either been born in or lived for years in their host countries. But growing up in the west doesn't make them love the west. The cause is irrational, as Islam is at the core of the problem. However much we try to "understand" them, however many times ignorant politicians repeat the lie that "we all pray to the same god," the fact is, increasing numbers of Islamics living in western nations want to destroy those same nations. It's wake up time!

In Britain we have had lurid court cases recently in which Islamic men of Pakistani origin have targetted vulnerable young girls for sex. Their own women, of course, are locked away at home and the men will only marry in an arranged marriage, usually with a woman from their homeland chosen by their family. Across Europe cases of rape are increasingly perpetrated by Islamics in one of the great under-reported stories of the age. In Paris, if they want to pray to their false god, hundreds of them sit down in the road and block the traffic, while the police watch impotently.

No wonder these immigrants and their offspring often hold western society in contempt and can easily see the day when they will run Europe, for attempts at controlling their excesses are half-hearted at best, while the laws are bent backwards to protect their so-called "rights," which include the right to a parallel legal system, Sharia Courts, something granted no other group in history.

This is not about to change, for Islam is rooted in seventh century savagery, a system that nobody in the modern world took seriously until.....we discovered oil in their territory. That's when the world started to change and our leaders began genuflecting to Islamics' puffed up ideas of their own importance.

Our civilisation's greatest error has been letting proponents of this savage false religion invade our shores and build their monuments to false faith all over our cities. Remember, no Bible is allowed in Saudi Arabia, home of Mecca. No churches are permitted there. No Jew can set foot there. We have to sharpen our minds, like steel on steel, to deflect this thrust at our throats. Those who won't stop until they are stopped- must be stopped. Now take a look at this report from America, about the home grown jihadists in their midst. Sound familiar?

Radical Muslims in America: All the Benefits and Still Turning to Jihad

Raymond Ibrahim - The War to Mobilize Democracy (WMD),  January 12th, 2011

Recent remarks by Attorney General Eric Holder on the threat posed by “radicalized” American Muslims are revealing — not just because of what they say regarding the domestic situation, but for their international implications as well. According to Holder:

   “[T]he threat is real, the threat is different, the threat is constant. The threat has changed … to worrying about people in the United States, American citizens — raised here, born here, and who for whatever reason, have decided that they are going to become radicalized and take up arms against the nation in which they were born. It is one of the things that keeps me up at night. You didn’t worry about this even two years ago — about individuals, about Americans, to the extent that we now do.” Holder noted that while he was confident in the United States’ counter-terrorism efforts, Americans “have to be prepared for potentially bad news…. The terrorists only have to be successful once.”

Holder’s assertion that “the terrorists only have to be successful once” has important implications: aside from the obvious — that it only takes one strike to create devastation on U.S. soil — it is also a reminder that when people argue that most American Muslims are moderate, and only a few are radical, it does not help our security. It took nineteen to commit 9/11; and we have already seen that some American Muslims are radical. According to Holder, in the last two years, 50 of the 126 people charged with terrorism were U.S. citizens.

Conversely, Holder’s point that “You didn’t worry about this even two years ago — about individuals, about Americans, to the extent that we now do,” is odd. Why should Americans not have been a worry two years ago? Anyone even moderately familiar with Islamist ideology knows that it allows for absolutely no national allegiance. The notion that some American Muslims could become radicalized should have been a concern since 9/11 — nearly a decade ago, not two years ago. It should have been a concern when it became obvious that American Muslims — like John Walker Lindh, Gregory Patterson, Levar Washington, Kevin James, Christopher Paul and Jose Padilla — were turning to violent jihad.

More significantly, the fact that Americans are being radicalized not only bodes ill for U.S. security; it also suggests that American efforts in the Muslim world are doomed to failure. Consider: if American Muslims, who enjoy Western benefits — including democracy, liberty, prosperity, and freedom of expression — are still being radicalized, why then do we insist that importing these same benefits to the Muslim world will eliminate its even more ingrained form of “radicalization”?

After all, the mainstream position, the only one evoked by politicians, both Democrat and Republican, is that all the sacrifices America makes in the Muslim world (Iraq, Afghanistan, etc.), will pay off once Muslims discover how wonderful Western ways are, and happily slough off their Islamist veneer, which, as the theory goes, is a product of — you guessed it — a lack of democracy, liberty, prosperity, and freedom of expression. Yet here are American Muslims, immersed in the bounties of the West — and still do they turn to violent jihad.

In short, America needs to rethink its strategy for the war on terrorism — both at home and abroad. Domestically, this means cracking down without compunction on anything that smacks of Islamist activity, without fear of being “politically incorrect;” it means better monitoring of jihadist websites which play a major role in radicalizing American Muslims, such as Inspire (which was started by a North Carolina Muslim); and it means exercising prudence when granting visas to people from dubious backgrounds. Internationally, it means understanding that the one solution to war promoted by most Western politicians — spreading Western values and ways of governance — is no solution at all.

Raymond Ibrahim is associate director of the Middle East Forum, author of The Al Qaeda Reader, and guest lecturer at the National Defense Intelligence College.

 

Bookmark and Share
Print

Tags:

Comment (1)

Loading... Logging you in...
Close

Login with your OpenID

Or create an account using OpenID

OpenID URL:
 
  • Logged in as
To: International citizens
BAN ISLAM

TO: THE WORLD COURT

IN THE INTEREST OF HUMAN VALUES AND UNIVERSAL LOVE, WE DIRECT THIS PETITION TO THE WORLD COURT FOR JUDGEMENT.

WE, THE UNDERSIGNED INTERNATIONAL PETITIONERS, REQUEST A BAN ON THE ORGANIZATION CALLED ISLAM. WE REQUEST THIS BAN DUE TO THE CRIMINAL ACTS OF ITS FOUNDER, MOHAMMED AND THE KORAN'S DOCTRINES WHICH PRESENTLY LEGITIMIZES THE CRIMINAL ACTS OF PAEDOPHILIA, ******INATIONS, THE OPPRESSION OF WOMEN BY SUPPRESSING THEIR HUMAN RIGHTS, THE PENALTIES OF STONING AND DISMEMBERMENT, THE UTILIZATION OF TERROR AS A WEAPON OF INTIMIDATION AND CONTROL.

View Current Signatures
http://www.PetitionOnline.com/MYSTIC/petition.htm...

Sincerely,
http://mypage.direct.ca/l/lbouchar/

 
 
Insert key words to search our site and archives
















'Know this first of all, that in the last days mockers will come ... saying, "Where is the promise of His coming?'
2 Peter 3:3

© Copyright 1995-2018 Designed by www.visual-craft.com
visitors counter
8502640