Israel - the only country in the world not supposed to defend itself. Comment by Alan - and from the Jerusalem Post.

By Alan Franklin. Israel is the only country in the world not accorded the right of self defense. My wife Pat is in northern Israel, where they have been having days of self defense drills, siren warnings and so on, at the sound of which toddlers and grandmas alike head for shelters. War looms, as I told our church on Sunday. Islamic aggression is behind it, and the incident with the deliberate provocation off the coast of Israel will hasten it, as the world jumps to condemn the only democracy in the Middle East.


I did two radio broadcasts to America last week, getting at least some of the Israeli story out. I told of Hezbollah arming itself to the teeth over the Lebanese border, with arms filtered through from Iran to Syria to Lebanon, then to Hezbollah. I said the last item on an evening news bulletin in Israel last week told of a rocket being fired into Israel from Gaza, home of some of the most murderous thugs in the world in the form of Hamas. Hamas seem to think they have the right to lob high explosives onto Israel homes and schools, whereas when Israeli troops go in to stop them it is the IDF which gets the world media on its back, despite its extraordinary efforts to minimise casualties.


One problem is that the world's media have Israel in the frame as the international Mr Nasty, whereas the truth is the exact opposite, with wounded terrorists airlifted to Israeli hospitals and given top medial care. I know this from first hand accounts from my family, by the way- it is not hearsay. Israel treats all prisoners under international law and they are allowed Red Cross visits. Israelis kidnapped by Islamic terrorists are seldom seen again and are never allowed visits.


It must be said that Israel often doesn't tell its own story well, so the war of words is usually lost. Here is a comment from today's Jerusalem Post, which provides one of our news tickers. To see more of what really happened, take a look at the JP ticker, as you surely won't get a balanced report from the Biased Broadcasting Corporation.


Analysis: Media defense washed away by the flotilla

05/31/2010 04:20

In the end, after all, the flotilla is just another chapter in an int'l campaign to chip away at Israel’s legitimate right to defend itself.


Israel likely lost the battle over the flotilla of international aid ships on their way to the Gaza Strip even before the activists left their home countries and gathered in Cyprus late last week.

From a global media perspective, the story is pretty clear. Hundreds of international activists, some of them parliamentarians from Europe and Israel, are trying to bring thousands of tons of supplies to the Gaza Strip, and Israel is stopping them.

For the international media and its consumers, the reasons behind Israel’s decision do not make much of a difference, since what Israel is doing fits the way it is already widely perceived – as a violent aggressor abusing a weak and poor Palestinian people.

In its defense, Israel, this time, did not stand by idly as it was slammed throughout the world. It launched a diplomatic initiative aimed at explaining to the world why it planned to stop the ships.

First, it made the claim that the Gaza Strip was not suffering from a humanitarian crisis and that the thousands of tons in supplies that the ships were carrying were not really needed, since it was all already supplied to the Palestinians by Israel. The IDF went so far as to invite media down to the Kerem Shalom crossing to videotape the hundreds of trucks that transfer supplies daily from Israel to Gaza. At the same time, Israel offered to transfer the shipments on the boats to the Gaza Strip after they were unloaded at the Ashdod Port and inspected.

Next, it tackled the delegitimization effort. Stories were leaked by the government to the press about the Turkish Humanitarian Relief Foundation (IHH), the Turkish organization that is behind the flotilla, described as a “radical Islamic organization” that was outlawed by Israel in 2008 for allegedly serving as a major component in Hamas’s global fund-raising machine.

In addition to this effort, the long-standing claim was restated that if this flotilla were allowed to enter Gaza, it would open the door to unsupervised shipments that could contain not just flour, cement and medical supplies but also explosives, Kalashnikov rifles and Iranian-made, long-range Fajr-5 missiles.

In the end, though, none of this official Israeli counter-effort will really make a difference, since what will ultimately determine the impact of the flotilla saga will be the pictures and videotapes published and broadcast around the world.

All that is needed for the flotilla to “succeed” is a single picture of an Israeli soldier applying a headlock to an international activist. And no matter how hard Israel tries to block broadcasts from the ships, the pictures will get out. Facebook and Twitter are already full of snapshots, around-the-clock updates and even a live streaming video.


Israel had other options. One was to stop the ships far out at sea, inspect them, maybe even arrest a terror suspect or two if there were such aboard, and then let the ships sail freely into Gaza.

Another option was to simply let the ships through unchecked. In the absence of intelligence indicating that the ships were carrying arms, the risk might not have been that great. Yes, it could have paved the way for additional flotillas, but all of these could be inspected by the navy, which would be tasked with ruling out the possibility that arms were being smuggled in by sea.

Let’s not fool ourselves. Even if Israel allowed these ships and all such ships to dock in Gaza City’s harbor, it would still be accused of laying siege to the Palestinians in the Strip since, albeit along with Egypt, it controls the land crossings.

In the end, after all, the flotilla is just another chapter in an international campaign to chip away at Israel’s legitimate right to defend itself.



Insert key words to search our site and archives

But the Spirit explicitly says that in later times some will fall away from the faith, paying attention to deceitful spirits and doctrines of who forbid marriage and advocate abstaining from foods which God has created to be gratefully shared in by those who believe and know the truth. (Forbidding to marry, as the Roman Catholic Church does, is a doctrine of demons.)
1 Timothy 4:1-3

© Copyright 1995-2021 Designed by
visitors counter