“Never forget. There is no such thing as radical Islam. All Islam is radical. There may be Muslims who don’t practice their religion, much like others. The Quran is a book that preaches hate.” So said John Jamason, American patriot. For the first time, Muslim Brotherhood groups and Islamic supremacists have an administration working with them to impose Sharia, the authoritarian system of Islamic oppression, on the U.S. America is fast following Europe in being subjagated to Islamic mores. Alan Franklin introduces a brilliant article on the unreported takeover.
So why is this happening? Obama has an Islamic name, Islamic roots, is descended from Arab slave traders and, when in school in Indonesia, had his religion listed as “Islamic.” No surprise, then, that America, fast following Europe, is becoming Islamicized, while big media pretends all is well. Obama was described
as an Indonesian citizen and a Muslim at his school registration in Jakarta. He has described the Islamic call to prayer as “the prettiest sound on earth.”
Pamela Geller has written a book called The Islamization of America in 2013 and there follows part of an article she wrote following its publication. It is packed full of facts every citizen of the USA needs to know and act upon, before America slides as far down the slippery slope to destruction as Europe has.
Over here in the United Kingdom
we are now far from united, as millions of Muslims, whose religion demands our conversion, subjugation or death, have swarmed into our nation. As I travel round on speaking engagements I visit large cities where whole areas are now Islamic, complete with women in burkas, mosques – often in former Christian church buildings - and intimidation of non-Muslims.
In London, Islamics attacked, killed and attempted to behead a British soldier just a short walk of his barracks. In one heavily Islamic area of a prominent northern city in England, a van driven by a Muslim drove straight at our car. We were told this was a common practice to intimidate non-Islamics. I will talk about Islam and other false religions to any church group or conference that invites me, in America, Canada or the UK. Get the truth while you still can, or find out the facts from our books, available on our web shop: http://www.thefreepressonline.co.uk/shop.htm
Here is part of Pamela Geller’s article, the full text of which is available on this site: http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Peace/2014/01/09/The-Islamization-of-America-in-2013
(Breitbart) – Since I wrote my book
Stop the Islamization of America
and established the Stop Islamization of America initiative of my organization, the American Freedom Defense Initiative (AFDI),
we have seen increasing accommodation and submission to Islam in the United States. This past year was a particularly good year for Islamic supremacists, who are working furiously in this country to impose Sharia (Islamic law) — and in particular, the blasphemy laws under the Sharia.
The Islamic supremacist approach is stealthier here in the States than it is in Europe, where we see no-go zones, mass car burnings, etc., because Europe currently has a much bigger Muslim population than the U.S.does.
That kind of aggression is in our future, for nothing is being done to prevent its coming here. The few of us who dare to speak against Sharia and jihad are blacklisted from the mainstream media’s major newspaper and broadcast outlets.
Trimmers (those who soften the message about Islam or speak of “Islamism,” an artificial word making a distinction without a difference) and Islamic apologists are dusted off and trotted out to make some inane comment whenever the mainstream media cannot avoid covering a jihad news story (such as the Boston Marathon jihad bombing). But the effective true voices against Islamization, such as myself, Robert Spencer, Wafa Sultan, and Ibn Warraq are rarely seen these days.
It’s never been as bad as it is now, and we have never been proven so right as we were in 2013. In the U.S., in
released at the end of 2012, almost half of the Muslims in America said that they thought parodies of Muhammad should be subject to criminal prosecution. One in eight thought that insulting Islam should be a death penalty offense. Forty percent said that they shouldn’t have to obey U.S.laws, but should be subject only to Islamic law.
These findings should have come as no surprise; they weren’t much different from those of
a May 2013 survey of Muslims worldwide. The
that the harshest Sharia punishments enjoy broad support among Muslims the world over: “72% of Indonesian Muslims, 84% of Pakistani Muslims, 82% of Bengladeshi Muslims, 74% of Egyptian Muslims, and 71% of Nigerian Muslims supported making Sharia the official state law of their respective societies.” 85% of Muslims in Pakistan, 81% inAfghanistan, and 70% in Egypt supported the most brutal aspects of Sharia, such as amputating the hands of thieves. 86% of Muslims inPakistan, 84% inAfghanistan, and 80% inEgyptsupported stoning for adultery. 75% inPakistan, 79% inAfghanistan, and 88% in Egypt favored executing those who leave Islam. “91% of Iraqi Muslims and 99% of Afghan Muslims supported making Sharia the official state law of their respective societies.”
And in America, wherever Islamic law and American law conflict, it is increasingly American law that gives way. Islam is even taught in public schools, according to a report at
An elementary school teacher in Chesapeake,Va.has been charged with simple assault after a parent claimed her daughter’s hand was cut open as a result of the teacher yanking her arm aggressively while trying to teach students an “Islamic hand sign.”
In November 2012, a Muslim mother went on trial for beating her teenage daughter after the girl refused an arranged marriage and was seen at school talking to a boy who was not her planned husband. Her devout Muslim father stabbed his daughter in the neck, leaving a wound an inch and a half long, and admitted that he tried to kill her. This couple was freed: the mother got two years of probation.
Arizona. Not Yemen, not Iran, but Phoenix. This is the Sharia in America, for honor violence is not merely sanctioned in Islam, it is encouraged. And honor murder of the offspring is sanctioned under Islam: according to
Reliance of the Traveller: A Classic Manual of Islamic Sacred Law, “not subject to retaliation” is “a father or mother (or their fathers or mothers) for killing their offspring, or offspring’s offspring” (o1.1-2).
The following month, a leader of the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt, which has now been declared a terrorist organization by the Egyptian government,
spoke at a mosque in Brooklyn. The NYPD enforced the Sharia there as well, arresting a man who came to protest against Brotherhood atrocities inEgypt. One must not criticize Islam or its self-appointed representatives – even in Brooklyn.
In another Sharia ruling that same month,
a federal judge ruled
against aTulsa police captain who had exercised his First Amendment rights and refused to force some of his subordinates to attend a dawah (Islamic proselytizing) event at aTulsa mosque. If these police officers had been required to go to a church, they’d have won their case.
in November 2013, the YMCA and the St. Paul Police Department organized a Muslim swim, restricted to Muslim women only, with taxpayer dollars. The police department is providing transportation for the Muslimas to segregated Sharia swim at the YMCA. There are thousands of Islamic centers across the country — Sharia swim belongs there, not in our public pools. If it is so crucial that these Muslims live under Sharia, why move here? Why not live in a Sharia state?
Instead, Sharia is coming here. In June 2013,
it was revealed
that the San Francisco Airport used public money to construct a foot-washing station for Muslims.Harvard Universityin January 2013
posted a Qur’anic verse
at the entrance of its
faculty of law,describing the verse as one of the greatest expressions for justice in history, heedless of the fact that Sharia law is the antithesis of America law. The Constitution is the great shining moment of Western civilization, based on individual rights, the premise of which is the opposite of Islamic law. (AF adds: In fact it is wholly based on the Holy Bible!)
In Minnesota, a Catholic university, the University of St. Thomas,
in January 2013installed mini-mosques and Islamic foot baths for Muslims. Where are the cathedrals and pews in the madrassas? There is no reciprocity in Islam. Non-Muslims cannot pray in mosques. Non-Muslims are only permitted into mosques for
(proselytizing). Islamic outreach goes only one way: to Islam. But this is a Catholic university turning itself over to the very ideology that inspires the mass slaughter of Christians across the world. It is astonishing and horrifying in the same breath.
Public schools inFlorida
that Muhammad is “God’s messenger.”
In Indiana, a Muslim family went from classroom to classroom in a public school, handing out material proselytizing for Islam.Texas public school students
were made to wear burqas. In January 2013
in Maryland, Muslim high school students demanded prayer accommodations in a public school.
In August 2013, aTennessee elementary school banned pork to avoid offending Muslims.Children are drawing
the five pillars of Islam inTennessee public schools. The Nashville,Tennessee, public school system is
teaching dangerous lies
in an Islamic lesson plan rife with grammatical errors and poor English. Where are the children’s drawings of Christ on the cross? Where are the teachings of the Rashi? Where is the Chumash?
This isn’t public education. This is
dawah. And it is happening all over, but patriots are fighting back: in September 2013, an Ohio mom got an Islamic proselytizing video removed
from her child’s seventh-grade history class. In November 2013, hundreds of parents
against pro-Islam indoctrination contained in a public school textbook.
In New York, the NYPD is enforcing Sharia as well: police have orders not to ticket cars that are illegally parked outside of mosques. The NYPD lets Muslims break laws ordinary citizens would ordinarily face extensive punitive damages for, simply because they are Muslims. If someone is double parked because he is going to church, he would get a ticket right away.
Other Muslims in Brooklyn
flex their muscles
by holding prayers out on the street, making it impossible for anyone to pass.(AF notes: This happens in Europe, in major cities like Paris.)
Meanwhile, the media and law enforcement turn a blind eye to abuse when Muslims are its perpetrators.
In October 2013, a student at a Muslim school in Ohio reported that “if they do not learn their religious passages as they are instructed,” they are at times “chained to a wall by their wrists and ankles and beaten with a long stick.” The imams of Sacramento’s two largest mosques
in June 2013 declared
that Muhammad had forbidden music. The media yawned.
The media kept yawning when those whom it had anointed as “moderates” were repeatedly exposed as “extremists.” In December 2012, a Bangladesh tribunal
the New York imam and President of the “moderate” Islamic Circle of North America, Ashrafuzzaman Khan, of war crimes and mass murder.
Not until ten months later
did ICNA remove Khan’s name from its website — in the same way as Muslim groups and Islamic supremacists in America scrub their narrative of the jihadic doctrine and the brutal and bloody Sharia (although at that time Khan
on the contact page for the North American Imams Federation Northeast regional office).
I’d like to know what took so long. Why did they stand behind this vicious, bloodthirsty savage all this time? Because he is a devout Muslim adhering to Islamic texts and teachings?
The most prominent “moderate” organization, the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), despite its Hamas and Muslim Brotherhood ties and the convictions of several of its officials on jihad terror charges, continued to enjoy mainstream acceptance in 2013. Melvin Bledsoe, the father of Muslim jihad terrorist Abdulhakim Mujahid Muhammad, actually
with a Florida school board to stop CAIR from giving presentations in public schools.
But mostly CAIR advanced unopposed. No one was particularly concerned when it came to light that a CAIR-tied American imam, Khalid Yasin,
the devout Muslim who beheaded a British soldier on a public street in London, or when former CAIR-New York official Cyrus McGoldrick justified the beheading, claiming that “British and American soldiers commit worse atrocities against Muslims every day.” Nor did anyone seem to mind when
CAIR told the family
of a dead jihadist not to talk to the FBI.
In February 2013, the Maryland chapter of CAIR
that its operatives had testified at a hearing of the Maryland General Assembly’s Health & Government Operations Committee in support a law that “would prohibit any state agency or employee from aiding in the detention of a person in accordance with what many say are unconstitutional provisions of the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA).” How was it that a Muslim Brotherhood-linked group would be testifying on such a matter? It would be like Nazis testifying at hearings during World War II on the detention of Third Reich “detainees.”
And in August 2013, in another incident indicative of undeserved CAIR’s mainstream status, a pro-jihad CAIR official gave a presentation on “Understanding Sharia & Family Law Mediation”
at a legal conference on Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR). In the environment in which all this is happening, it is no surprise that your First Amendment rights are being obliterated. John Jamason, a patriot in Florida,
posted a message on Facebook on our national day of grief, September 11: “Never forget. There is no such thing as radical Islam. All Islam is radical. There may be Muslims who don’t practice their religion, much like others. The Quran is a book that preaches hate.”
For that, Hamas-tied CAIR called for his firing. Palm Beach County Administrator Bob Weisman said that Jamason would have been fired had he not been a merit system employee. Yet Jamason’s message was true. Twelve years after 9/11, Islamic blasphemy law was quickly becoming the law of the land. Jamason, however, stood his ground and said to reporters: “If I owe anybody an apology, it would be the county commissioners and county administration just for the fact that you’re all on my porch. No, I don’t think I owe anybody an apology, I didn’t say anything offensive.”
He didn’t do or say anything offensive. But when it comes to Islam, there is nothing too small or insignificant that cannot be deemed “offensive.”
CAIR worked in numerous other ways also to bring the Sharia to the U.S.In one notable instance, it
against DHL to impose Muslim prayer times on the workplace in Kentucky. It is not required for a Muslim to pray at a certain time if necessity makes it impossible to do so. Prayer is not absolutely required a strict schedule, and Muslim prayers are commonly “made up” after work or school. Suits like the one are merely devices in which to impose Islam on non-believers.
The Obama Administration helped out with that endeavor in 2013. For the first time, Muslim Brotherhood groups and Islamic supremacists have an administration working with them to impose Sharia, the authoritarian system of Islamic oppression, on the U.S. Obama’s Justice Department
announced, in an out-of-the-way corner ofTennessee, its intention to criminalize free speech on social media posts that Muslims found offensive. AFDI/SIOA called for a protest of this attempt to impose Islam’s blasphemy laws on Americans – and in a town of 10,000 people, two thousand patriots showed up.
In keeping with Obama’s vow that
“the future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam,”
the filmmaker of a video on Muhammad that the Administration falsely blamed for the Benghazi jihad attack of September 11, 2012 was imprisoned: Obama’s first political prisoner. In August 2013, he finally got
“supervised release” from jail.
In May 2013, the Sharia administration strikes again. The EEOC sued Star Transport for rightfully terminating two Muslims who refused to do their job and transport alcohol. If these Muslim truck drivers didn’t want to deliver alcohol, then they shouldn’t have taken a job in which part of their duties would be to deliver alcohol. It’s that simple. The EEOC needs reminding that its name is the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. “Equal” as in no special rights for any particular class.
In a similar case in
November 2013, a Muslim was awarded $66,000 in back pay after he was fired for refusing to shave his beard in accordance with company rules. This ruling could put the company, American Patriot, out of business. That’s the whole point: Muslim Brotherhood groups demand that non-Muslims adhere to the Sharia, or they’ll destroy them. And they use American law to impose Islamic law. Islamic supremacists chip chip away at the establishment clause, and in doing so, impose Islam on the secular marketplace.
Muslim lawsuits against
Hertz, Wal-Mart, Target, Disney, and a host of other American businesses for special rights and special accommodation have been largely successful, creating special rights for a special class of people — which is an accordance with Islam (in which Muslims are superior to the kuffar). But it goes against every American tenet of individual rights and separation of religion and state.
Muslim Brotherhood groups continued their influence on the Obama Administration in 2013, while the mainstream media heaped ridicule on Michele Bachmann and anyone else who dared to suggest that this influence might exist. Yet for the first time in history,America is supporting pro-Sharia, anti-freedom forces on a large scale – the same enemy that struck us on September 11, 2001. This has resulted in the loss of Egypt and Libya and perhaps eventually the whole of Africa to Islamic supremacist regimes.
With all this happening, it is no surprise that the culture has accepted the norming of Sharia restrictions. The
Wall Street Journal
reported in July 2013 that Joyce Carol Oates set off a firestorm on Twitter “with a pair of tweets about sexual violence in Egypt.” One asked: “Where 99.3% of women report having been sexually harassed & rape is epidemic –Egypt–natural to inquire: what’s the predominant religion?”
Even for a revered leftist icon like Joyce Carol Oates, the resulting uproar was swift and predictable. Umair Haque of the
Harvard Business Review
fumed: “Don’t miss @JoyceCarolOates coming out publicly as a serious bigot. Check out her tweets today, they’re awesomely gross!” Salon’s
smeared Oates as “Islamophobic.” Feminists and Islamic supremacists alike lined up to condemn Oates as a racist-Islamophobic-anti-Muslim-bigot.
Welcome to my world, Joyce. Wait until she broaches subjects such as honor killings, female genital mutilation, forced marriage, child marriage, etc. Wait until she dares to subject that Islam has something to do with those, too, as it obviously does. Something tells me she enjoys the blacklist. The sharp, piercing shrieks against the truth speak volumes and expose the left for the monsters they are.
In November 2013,
Conan O’Brien tweeted
innocuous joke about Marvel’s new Muslim superheroine: “She has so many more special powers than her husband’s other wives.”
Didn’t Conan know that you cannot joke about Islam and Sharia, or misogyny, gender apartheid, creed apartheid, misogyny, or polygamy under the Sharia? It’s blasphemy. Off with his head. Islamic supremacists and their leftist tools went after Conan immediately, calling him a racist, and he apologized. First off, Islam is not a race. Secondly, multiple wives are encouraged in Islam.
70% of American Muslims
say that polygamy should be legalized in theUS, with
over 100,000 Muslims engaging in polygamy
here in America.
And also worth noting is the fact that Muhammad’s favorite wife was six years old when he married her. This Muslima superhero is 16 — practically an old lady. Conan didn’t joke about that. And lastly, where is Marvel’s Christian superheroine, Jewish superheroine, Hindu superheroine, et al?
October 2013, my law firm, the American Freedom Law Center (AFLC), on behalf of AFDI, struck a blow against this Sharia self-enforcement. We
filed a motion
asking the federal court in Seattle to order the King County transit authorities to run our anti-terrorism advertisement featuring photos of 16 of the world’s Most Wanted Terrorists.
Yes, 12 years after 9/11, it has come to this: We have to file suit to fight against jihad terrorism. As
put it, “posting the images of wanted terrorists is now the business of hatemongers and those who defend said terrorists are freedom’s champions.”
It all started last July, when the FBI ran a terrorism awareness campaign featuring
depicting photos of 16 wanted terrorists, all of whom were Muslim. This was a publicity campaign sponsored by the Joint Terrorism Task Force for the State Department’s Rewards for Justice program, or RFJ. But then the leftists and Islamic supremacists complained that the ads were “Islamophobic,” and they came down – and unbelievably,Seattle is refusing to allow my group, the AFDI, to put them back up.
The Islamic supremacist enemies of free speech won a victory in Boston. My organization AFDI tried to place pro-Israel ads in Boston, countering anti-Israel ads that ran there. Our ad read, “In any war between the civilized man and the savage, support the civilized man. Support Israel. Defeat jihad.”
The ad was rejected, and we sued. In late December 2013, U.S. District Court Judge Gorton ruled against us in our
against Boston’s Massachusetts Bay Transit Authority (MBTA). No surprise here; during our hearing Judge Gorton said that he did not have the authority to rule on matters out of his jurisdiction. Still, Gorton dropped the ball on the question of “reasonableness.”
This is Boston, after all, site of the most recent jihad bombing in America, so Gorton’s ruling is sad and regrettable. We will, of course, appeal. But the willful ignorance of MBTA authorities is no surprise:
after all, the mainstream media tried to blame the Boston Marathon bombing on Americans being unwelcoming to immigrants, while the Department of Homeland Security and the FBI dropped the ball: although Russia warned them several times about the jihadist activities of Tamerlan Tsarnaev, they never placed him under surveillance. And in September 11, 2013, a
Boston school recited a Muslim prayer instead of the Pledge of Allegiance.
And when we ran ads telling the truth about jihad and Islamic anti-Semitism in San Francisco
in March 2013, a host of city officials, including the District Attorney and several city lawmakers, held a news conference to
denounce our ads. The slaughter of Christians in Nigeria, Egypt,Syria, et al — that didn’t warrant a statement, let alone a press conference, but my ads did. Think about that. Thousands dead, but it would be blasphemy to talk about that. Slaughter in the cause of jihad is okay; my talking about it is the problem.
Alan Franklin concludes: You can read the full article by Pamela as mentioned above. However, I would say that from my knowledge of what’s going on in Europe everything stated is true. As Muslim numbers increase, from both a high birthrate and immigration, so they become emboldened. We have been told by British Christians that, outside their often huge mosques, Moslems park as they like, ignoring traffic laws. The police ignore these violations.
There is evidence of everything from vote fraud to attacks on those in Islamic - dominated areas who are not conforming to what they regard as their “norm,” whether it is by drinking alcohol or the wrong way of dressing.
The fact that the Moslems often violently object to the nations they have – or their parents have - chosen to live in is a paradox they dare not truthfully address.